Tác động của phong cách giảng dạy đến sự hài lòng của sinh viên: Kiểm định vai trò trung gian của sự gắn kết học tập
và
Article Sidebar
Full Text: 
PDF
Abstract
In this study, we analyze the impact of teaching style on the satisfaction of students majoring in Chinese, with particular emphasis on the mediating role of learning engagement. Grounded in theoretical frameworks such as Student Involvement, Self-Regulated Learning, and Teaching for Quality Learning, the research adopts a quantitative design employing the PLS-SEM model. Data were collected from 500 Chinese language majors across three universities. The findings indicate that Teaching Style (TS) exerts a positive influence on Learning Engagement (ENG), which in turn significantly affects Learning Satisfaction (SAT), with β_indirect = 0,35; t = 12,7; p < 0,001. These results highlight the pivotal role of teaching approaches in shaping students’ academic experiences and further demonstrate that as students become more engaged, the effect of teaching style on their satisfaction is strengthened.
Tóm tắt
Trong bài nghiên cứu này, tác động của phong cách giảng dạy đến sự hài lòng của sinh viên học tiếng Trung được phân tích, trong đó nhấn mạnh vai trò trung gian của sự gắn kết học tập. Nghiên cứu được thực hiện dựa trên các cơ sở lý thuyết như Student Involvement (sự tham gia của sinh viên), Self-Regulated Learning (tự điều chỉnh học tập) và Teaching for Quality Learning (giảng dạy cho học tập chất lượng), đồng thời số liệu được thống kê theo hướng định lượng với mô hình Partial Least Squares – Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Dữ liệu được thu thập từ 500 sinh viên ngành tiếng Trung của 3 trường đại học. Kết quả cho thấy Phong cách giảng dạy (Teaching Style -TS) tác động tích cực đến Gắn kết học tập (Engagement - ENG) làm ảnh hưởng tới Mức độ hài lòng trong học tập (Satisfaction - SAT), β_indirect = 0,35; t = 12,7; p < 0,001, điều này khẳng định vai trò then chốt của phương pháp giảng dạy trong việc định hình trải nghiệm học tập, đồng thời cho thấy khi sinh viên gắn kết nhiều hơn, tác động của phong cách giảng dạy đến sự hài lòng càng mạnh.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Framework of Self-Regulated Cognitive Engagement (FSRCE) for sustainable pedagogy: a model that integrates SRL and cognitive engagement for holistic development of students. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2363157.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2363157
Ameyaw, D., & Khumalo S. (2024). The Involvement, Engagement and Satisfaction of Higher Education Students: A Literature Review. International Journal of Religion, 5(9) 638-647, https://doi.org/10.61707/fr1e9j19
Astin, A. W. (1997). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. John Wiley & Sons.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2003). Teaching for quality learning. Buckingham: Society for.
De Loof, H., Struyf, A., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2021). Teachers’ motivating style and students’ motivation and engagement in STEM: The relationship between three key educational concepts. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl 1), 109-127.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9830-3
de Ruig, N. J., Zee, M., & de Jong, P. F. (2024, May). Understanding the interplay between teacher self-efficacy, teacher–student interactions, and students’ self-regulated learning skills at different levels of classroom ecology. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1392907). Frontiers Media SA.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1392907
Dung, T. M., Nga, N. T., Trung, T. T., & Trung, L. T. B. T. (2025). Understanding Student Engagement with Mobile Learning: A Structural Model for Interactive Education in Vietnam. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(12).
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i12.52925
Fornell, C., & Larcker D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1) 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Chen, C. (2022). Measurement of engagement in the foreign language classroom and its effect on language achievement: The case of Chinese college EFL students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(3), 233–248.
https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0118
Hair, J. F., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1, 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 (Emerald)
Kangas, M., Siklander, P., Randolph, J., & Ruokamo, H. (2017). Teachers' engagement and students' satisfaction with a playful learning environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 274-284.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.018
Kuh, G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties.
Kock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Lin, L., Huang, Z., Othman, ., & Luo, Y. (2020) Correction: Let’s make it better: An updated model interpreting international student satisfaction in China based on PLS-SEM approach. PLOS ONE 15(11): e0242583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242583
Marina, I., Natalia, M., Tatiana, K., & Nataliya, S. (2019). The influence of the teaching style of communication on the motivation of students to learn foreign languages. Journal of Language and Education, 5(2(18)), 67-77.
https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9695
Méndez-Suárez, M., Martínez, V., & Cervantes M. (2021). Marketing Mix Modeling Using PLS-SEM, Bootstrapping the Model Coefficients. Mathematics, 9(15), 1832. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9151832
Nguyen, T. D. (2024). Examining the impact of university teaching quality on learning engagement: A cross-sectional study in Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 102-111.
https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2024.378
Pavlov, G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., Shi, D. (2021). Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(1) 110-130.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420926231
Pan, R., Qin, Z., Zhang, L., Lou, L., Yu, H., & Yang, J. (2023). Exploring the impact of intelligent learning tools on students’ independent learning abilities: a PLS-SEM analysis of grade 6 students in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 558.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02065-3
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Samaddar, R., & Sikdar, D. P. (2023). Development in teaching style on classroom management. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 20(1), 47-58.
https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2023/v20i1441
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J., Ringle, C. (2019). How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3) 197-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003
Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher education, 85(5), 957-978.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 15-26.
晏文娟. (2024). 大学英语混合式教学学生满意度及其影响因素实证研究. Advances in Education, 14, 530. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.145730