Khảo sát hiệu quả hệ thống quản lý học tập Moodle tại Khoa Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn, Đại học Cần Thơ
,
*
,
và
Article Sidebar
Full Text: 
PDF
Abstract
This study evaluates Moodle's effectiveness at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Can Tho University, from students' perspectives. A mixed-method survey was conducted with 354 students, including 265 with LMS experience. Findings reveal Moodle is primarily used for downloading materials and assignment submissions, while interactive features remain underutilized. Students faced challenges including system errors, unstable connectivity, and a complex interface. Regression analysis identified learning material quality and instructor interaction as key factors influencing usage effectiveness. The research proposes interface optimization, offline access development, and enhanced LMS training. Results provide empirical foundations for improving Moodle effectiveness and digital education quality.
Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu được thực hiện nhằm đánh giá hiệu quả Moodle tại Khoa Khoa học Chính trị, Xã hội và Nhân văn, Đại học Cần Thơ từ góc độ sinh viên. Có 354 sinh viên được khảo sát bằng phương pháp định lượng và định tính, trong đó 265 sinh viên có kinh nghiệm sử dụng LMS. Kết quả cho thấy Moodle chủ yếu dùng để tải tài liệu và nộp bài tập, các tính năng tương tác còn hạn chế. Khó khăn gặp phải gồm lỗi hệ thống, kết nối mạng không ổn định và giao diện phức tạp. Phân tích hồi quy xác định chất lượng học liệu và tương tác với giảng viên là yếu tố chính ảnh hưởng hiệu quả sử dụng. Việc tối ưu giao diện, phát triển truy cập offline và tăng cường đào tạo LMS được đề xuất trong nghiên cứu. Kết quả cung cấp cơ sở thực tiễn nâng cao hiệu quả Moodle, cải thiện chất lượng giáo dục số.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Afolabi, O. S., & Ajani, O. A. (2023). South African rural students' adoption and use of learning management systems. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science, 12(4).
Ahmed, K., & Mesanovic, M. (2019). Learning management systems and student performance. International Journal for e-Learning Security, 8, 582–591.
https://doi.org/10.20533/ijels.2046.4568.2019.0073
Alenezi, A. (2018). Barriers to participation in learning management systems in Saudi Arabian universities. Education Research International, 2018, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9085914
Alshehri, Ahmed & Rutter, Malcolm & Smith, Sally. (2020). The Effects of Gender and Age on Students' Use of a Learning Management System in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 6. 135. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.6.3.135-145
Barbosa, O. A., Jesús, F., Álvarez, A., & Ramírez Salazar, M. (2020). Moodle platform: A useful tool in the teaching–learning process. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352064906_moodle_platform_a_useful_tool_in_the_teaching-_learning_process
Berbudi, A., Rabbani, F., & Wahyudi, K. (2024). Effectiveness of learning management system and peer assessment method in parasitology learning at Padjadjaran University, Faculty of Medicine. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 5, 11–19.
https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v5i1.351
Binyamin, S. S. (2019). Using the technology acceptance model to measure the effects of usability attributes and demographic characteristics on student use of learning management systems in Saudi higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Edinburgh Napier University).
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Duch, D., May, M., and George, S. (2024). Enhancing predictive analytics for students’ performance in Moodle: Insight from an empirical study. Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems2(4). https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJDSIS42023777
Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education institutions. Journal of online learning & teaching, 11(2). https://jolt.merlot.org/Vol11no2/Fathema_0615.pdf
Fatmi, N., Muhammad, I., Muliana, M., and Nasrah, S. (2021). The utilization of Moodle-based learning management system (LMS) in learning mathematics and physics to students’ cognitive learning outcomes. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 3, 155.
https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v3i2.4665
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
Hoang, T. N., Phan, T. Q., & Vo, M. D. Q. (2022). Learning management systems and student engagement in blended learning: A study at Hanoi University of Industry. Journal of Language and Life, 7(328), 126–133 (in Vietnamese).
Hussein, L., Alqarni, K., Agina, M., Hilmi, M. F., Al Sheerawi, N., Abdelreheem, K., Hassan, T., & Tashtoush, M. (2024). The mediating role of learning management system use in enhancing system effectiveness. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 2067–2078. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.169
Morgan, K. (1970). Sample size determination using Krejcie and Morgan table. Kenya Projects Organization (KENPRO), 38(1970), 607-610.
Mtebe, J., & Raphael, C. (2018). Key factors in learners' satisfaction with the e-learning system at the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 107-122.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2993
Mpungose, C. (2020). Beyond limits: Lecturers’ reflections on Moodle uptake in South African universities. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5033–5052.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10190-8
Nguyen, H. H., & Nguyen, V. A. (2024). Evaluation of a personalized learning support system based on learning styles in the online environment of students at the University of Education – Vietnam National University, Hanoi. Journal of Education, 1, 54–58 (in Vietnamese).
Nguyen, T. M. N., & Tran, H. T. (2021). Factors affecting students’ satisfaction with blended learning: A case study of the School of Tourism – Hue University. Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 130(6E), 169–187 (in Vietnamese). https://jos.hueuni.edu.vn/index.php/hujos-ssh/article/view/6222/1415
Rajeswari, D., & Ramesh, R. (2024). Adoption of new trends on teaching and learning is LMS-Moodle: A bibliometric analysis between 2006 and 2022. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30, 1486-1495 . https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i2.7661
Suad, A., Tapalova, O., Berestova, A., and Vlasova, S. (2023). The impact of Moodle learning analytics on students’ performance and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 16, 297–312.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16418a
Can Tho University. (2012). Workshop on training management software of Can Tho University (ACCCU–Niche Project, Netherlands) (in Vietnamese).
https://www.ctu.edu.vn/webctu_old/tin-tuc/2268-hoi-thao-phan-mem-quan-ly-dao-tao-cua-truong-dhct-du-an-acccu-niche-ha-lan.html
Yunos, N., Muslim, N., Hussain, A., Hasim, N., Nazri, N., & Hamsan, M. (2024). Best practice of Moodle implementation for e-learning: A perspective of public university lecturers. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i5.3899
Zhafira, D., Simangunsong, I. P., & Harahap, S. S. (2024). Analyzing the utilization of learning management systems to support student learning in an online learning environment. Proceedings of International Conference on Education. https://doi.org/10.32672/pice.v2i1.1376