PHÂN TÍCH TĨNH PHI TUYẾN CỦA KHUNG THÉP PHẲNG SMRF CHỊU ĐỘNG ĐẤT
Abstract
Tóm tắt
Article Details
Tài liệu tham khảo
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington (DC): FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000.
ATC. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete building: volumes 1 and 2. Redwood City (California): ATC-40, Applied Technology Council; 1996.
Krawinkler H., and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K., 1998. Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Engineering structures 20(4-6): 452-464.
Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K., 2000. Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures. Earthquake spectra 16(2): 367-391.
Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C., 2004a. Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: vertically “regular” and irregular generic frames. Earthquake spectra 20(1): 255-271.
Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002), “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; 31:561582.
Chatpan Chintanapakdee, An Hong Nguyen and Toshiro Hayashikawa (2009). “Assessment of modal pushover analysis procedure for seismic evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frames”. The IES Journal Part A: Civil and Structural Engineering, Vol.2, No.3, pp. 174-186.
An Hong Nguyen, Chatpan Chintanapakdee and Toshiro Hayashikawa (2010). “Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of BRBF buildings”. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol.66, pp. 1118-1127.
M.S.Wiliams and Albermani (2003), “Evaluation of Displacement-Based Analysis and Design Methods for Steel Frames with Passive Energy Dissipators”. Civil Engineering Research Bulletin No.24
Akshay Gupta and Helmut Krawinkler (1999). “Seismic demands for perfor-mance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures”. Report No.132, The John A.Blume Earthquake Engineering Center.