Mối quan hệ giữa trách nhiệm xã hội, lãnh đạo và hiệu quả tài chính: Trường hợp doanh nghiệp khu vực thành phố
Abstract
This study is aimed to analyze the effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and transformational leadership on financial performance (FP) as well as the effect of transformational leadership in CSR by using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). CSR is measured by the stakeholders, including the environment, employees, customers, suppliers and communities. Business benefit (BB) is used as intermediate variables to measure the impact of CSR to FP. The result shows that CSR has a positive impact to BB and then BB has a positive impact to FP. Transformational leadership has a positive influence towards CSR in spite of its opposite effect to FP.
Tóm tắt
Article Details
Tài liệu tham khảo
Backhaus, K., Stone, B., and Heiner, K.,2002. Exploring the Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness. Business & Society, 41:292-318.
Bass, B. M., 1985. Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York, Free Press.
Burns, J. M., 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Carroll, A. B., 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business Society , 268-95.
Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B., & Shamir, B., 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 735–744.
Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Server, J., 2000. The Reputation Quotient: A Multi - Stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation. The Journal of Brand Management 7, 4: 241-55.
Freeman, R. E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Fry, L. W., 2003. Towards a Theory of Spiritual Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14: 693-727.
Gerbing WD & Anderson JC, 1988. An update paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimentionality and its assessments. Joirnal of Marketing Research.
Hair Jr IF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL & Black WC, 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th . Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Hemphill, J.K., 1949. Situational factors in leadership. Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Educational Research.
Hoàng Trọng và Chu Nguyễn Mộng Ngọc, 2008. Phân tích dữ liệu nghiên cứu với SPSS. NXB Hồng Đức.
Lee and Chuang, 2009. The Impact of Leadership Styles on Job Stress and Turnover Intention: Taiwan Insurance Industry as an Example. www.hclee@ttu.edu.tw.
Lê Thanh Hà, 2009. Trách nhiệm xã hội của doanh nghiệp trong bối cảnh Việt Nam gia nhập WTO và hội nhập kinh tế quốc tế. Hà Nội: Nhà xuất bản Khoa học và Kỹ thuật.
Lussier, R., & Achua, C., 2004. Leadership: Theory application skill development. Egan, MN: Thompson/South-Western.
Matten, D., & Moon, J., 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility: Education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 323–337.
Moore, B.V., 1927. The May conference on leadership. Personnel Journal.
Northouse, P., 2004. Leadership theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stogdill, R.M, 1974. Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
Stogdill, R.M. & Coons, A.E., 1957. Leader Behavior it’s Description and Measurement. Ohio: Bureau of Business Research, The Ohio State University, 88, 1-27.
Sweeney, L., 2009. A study of current practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and an examination of the relationship between CSR and Financial Performance using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Dublin: Dublin Institute of Technology.
Uadiale, O. M., & Fagbemi, T. O., 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Developing Economies: The Nigerian Experience. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3: 44-54.
VCCI, 2011. Báo cáo nghiên cứu luật pháp lao động và các chính sách trách nhiêm xã hội doanh nghiêp Việt Nam. Hà Nội: Phòng công nghiệp và thương mại Việt Nam.
Waddock, S., & Graves, S., 1997. The corporate social performance - financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 303-319.