Trách nghiệm xã hội doanh nghiệp: Mối quan hệ với hiệu quả hoạt động ở các doanh nghiệp Đồng bằng sông Cửu Long, Việt Nam

Châu Thị Lệ Duyên * và Nguyễn Phạm Tuyết Anh

* Tác giả liên hệ (ctlduyen@ctu.edu.vn)

Article Sidebar

Full Text: PDF

Ngày nhận bài: 06-02-2018
Ngày nhận bài sửa: 02-04-2018
Ngày duyệt đăng: 28-02-2019
Ngày xuất bản: 27-02-2019
Title: Corporate Social Responsibility: The relationship with financial Performance of of enterprises in the Mekong Delta, Viet Nam
DOI: 10.22144/ctu.jvn.2019.026
Lượt xem
296
Downloads
370
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Trích dẫn
Duyên, C. T. L., & Anh, N. P. T. (2019). Trách nghiệm xã hội doanh nghiệp: Mối quan hệ với hiệu quả hoạt động ở các doanh nghiệp Đồng bằng sông Cửu Long, Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Cần Thơ, 55(1), 88-100. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jvn.2019.026
Số báo
Tập. 55 Số. 1 (2019)
Chuyên mục
Kinh tế

Abstract

The study is aimed at analyzing the relationship of corporate social responsibility and financial performance by using structural equation modeling (SEM). This relationship is defined both directly and indirectly; it also examines the complex relationship between research concepts: social responsibility, performance, leadership, and business benefits.  The results show that corporate social responsibility has a positive impact on business benefits and business benefits positively impact on financial performance. However, leadership has a negative impact on financial performance when using transformational leadership.
Keywords: Business benefit, corporate social responsibility, financial performance, leadership

Tóm tắt

Nghiên cứu nhằm xây dựng và kiểm định mối quan hệ giữa trách nhiệm xã hội và hiệu quả hoạt động của doanh nghiệp bằng cách sử dụng phương pháp kiểm định mô hình kết cấu trúc tuyến tính (structural equation modeling - SEM). Mối liên hệ này được xác định cả trực tiếp và gián tiếp, đồng thời kiểm định mối quan hệ phức hợp giữa các khái niệm nghiên cứu: trách nhiệm xã hội, hiệu quả hoạt động, lãnh đạo và lợi ích kinh doanh của doanh nghiệp. Kết quả cho thấy trách nhiệm xã hội doanh nghiệp có tác động tích cực đến lợi ích kinh doanh, lợi ích kinh doanh có tác động tích cực đến hiệu quả hoạt động. Tuy nhiên, lãnh đạo có ảnh hưởng tiêu cực đến hiệu quả hoạt động khi sử dụng phong cách lãnh đạo chuyển đổi.
Từ khóa: Hiệu quả hoạt động, lợi ích kinh doanh, lãnh đạo, trách nhiệm xã hội của doanh nghiệp

Article Details

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W., 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25 (1): 186-192.

Alexander, G. J., and Buchholz, R. A., 1978. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21(3): 479–486.

Aragon-Correa, J.A., Hurtado-Torres, N., Sharma, S., Garcia-Morales, V.J., 2008. Environmental Strategy and Performance in Small Firms: A Resource-based Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 86: pp. 88-103.

ArlowP.,and Gannon M. J.,1982. Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance. The Academy of Management Review,7(2):235-241.

Bagozzi, R. P., and Foxall, G. R., 1996. Construct validation of a measure of adaptive-innovative cognitive styles in consumption. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 201-213.

Balabanis G., Philips H.,and Lyall J., 1998.Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Performance in the Top British Companies: Are They Related?European Business Review,98(1):25-44.

Barnett ML, Salomon RM., 2012. Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11): 1304-1320,

Belkaoui A. and Karpik P., 1988. Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social InformationAccounting. Auditing and Accountability Journal,2(1): 36-51.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G., 1980, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3): 588-606.

Carroll A., 1979. A Three DimensionalConceptual Model of Corporate Performance Academy of Management Review,4(4): 497-505.

Clarkson M., 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance.Academy of Management Review,20(1): 92-118.

Cochran, P. L.- Wood, R. A.,1984.Corporate Social Responsibility and FinancialPerformance, Academy of Management Journal,27: 42-56.

Collins, J. C., & Porras, J. I.,1997. Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: HarperBusiness.

Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B., and Shamir, B., 2002. Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 735–744.

Donaldson T. and Preston L., 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review,20(1): 65-92.

Evans W. and Freeman R., 1993. A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism, In Beauchamp T. and Bowie N.

Hart, S.L., Ahuja G., 1996. Does it pay to Be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance?,Business Strategy and the Environment, 5: 30-37.

Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Harrison J. and Freeman F., 1999. Stakeholders, Social Responsibility and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical PerspectivesAcademy of Management Journal,42(5): 479-88.

Hemphill T., 2004. Corporate Citizenship: The Case for a New Corporate Governance Model.Business & Society Review,109(3): 1-23.

Hopkins M., 2003.The Planetary Bargain: Corporate Social Responsibility Matters. Earthscan Publications Ltd.: London.

Hulland, John, Yiu Ho Chow, Shunyin Lam. 1996. Use of causal models in marketing research: A review. Internat.J.Res.Marketing, 13(April): 181–197.

Gilley J.E., Doran J.W., Eghball B., 2001. Tillage and fallow effects on selected soil quality characteristics of former conservation reserve program sites. J. of Soil and Water Cons, 56: 126-132.

Fombrun C.J., Gardberg N.A., Sever, J.M., 2000, The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. The Journal of Brand management, 7 (4): 241-255.

Freeman E., 1984.Strategic Management: A Stakeholder ApproachPitman: Boston

Johnson R. and Grenning D., 1999.The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance.Academy of Management Jurnal,42(5):564-76.

Kaiser, H. F., 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39: 31–36.

Kline, R. B., 2005. Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

McWilliams A. and Siegel D., 2000,Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification.Strategic Management Journal,21: 603-9.

Mintzberg H., 1983.The Case For Corporate Social Responsibility.The Journal ofBusiness Strategy,4(2):3-15.

Mitchell R. and Agle B., 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review,22(4): 853-87.

Moore G., 2001. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the UK Supermarket IndustryJournal of Business Ethics, 34(3/4): 299-315.

Neville B., Bell S. and Menguc B., 2005. Corporate Responsibility, Stakeholders and the Social Performance – Financial Performance RelationshipEuropean Journal of Marketing,39(9/10): 1184-98.

Northouse, P. G., 2004. Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H., 1994. The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3: 248-292.

Orlitzky M., 2005. Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Trade-Off or Virtuous Circle?University of Auckland Business Review,7(1): 37-43.

Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. and Rynes S., 2003. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta Analysis.Organisation Studies,24(3): 403-41.

Park S. and Lee S., 2009.Financial Rewards for Social Responsibility.Cornell Hospitality Quarterly,50(2):168-79.

Parket R. and Eilbirt H., 1975. Social Responsibility: The Underlying Factors. Business Horizons,18(4): 5-10,

Peterson D., 2004. The Relationship between Perceptions of Corporate Citizenship and Organisational Commitment.Business & Society,43(3): 296-319.

Prado-Lorenzo J., Gallego-Alvarez I., Garcia-Sanchez I. and Rodriguez-Dominguez L., 2008. Social Responsibility in Spain: Practices and Motivations in Firms.Management Decision,46(8): 1247-71.

Quinn J., 1997. Personal Ethics and Business Ethics: The Ethical Attitudes of Owner

Rex B. Kline, 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Second Edition. Methodology in the Social Sciences.

Renneboog L., Horst J. and Zhang C., 2008. Socially Responsible Investments: Institutional Aspects, Performance and Investor BehaviorJournal of Banking & Finance, 32: 1723-42.

Rowley T., 1997. Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder InfluencesAcademy of Management Review,22(4): 887-910,

Rowley T. and Berman S., 2000,A Brand NewBrand of Corporate Social Performance Business & Society,39(4): 397-419.

Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M., 2003. Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989:225-35.

Schmidt, Martin, B., and David J. Berri. 2004. "The Impact of Labor Strikes on Consumer Demand: An Application to Professional Sports." American Economic Review, 94(1): 344-357.

Stogdill, R., 1974. Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: The Free Press.

Steenkamp, J.E.M. & Van Trijp, H.C.M., 1991. The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Maketing, 8: 283-299.

Ullmann A. A. 1985. Data in search of a theory, a critical examination of the relationships among socialperformance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3):540–557.

Waddock S. and Graves S., 1997. The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link.Strategic Management Journal,18(4): 303-19.

Wood D. and Jones R., 1995.Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis,3(3):229-67