Organizing Project-based teaching according to the Blended learning model with Google Classroom/Zalo support for Mathematics pedagogy students at Kien Giang University using Methods of Teaching Mathematics module
Article Sidebar
Full Text: 
PDF
Abstract
Project-based teaching is a form of teaching that can comprehensively develop learners' abilities. However, Project-based teaching has certain limitations, such as time, space, costs, and ability. The Blended learning model can promote the advantages and overcome the limitations of Project-based teaching. Based on the study of teaching support applications, abilities of students, integrated learning system and information technology applications at Kien Giang University, the use of Google Classroom/Zalo in teaching at school is suitable in the current period. This study presents the advantages of Project-based teaching according to the Blended learning model, proposes a Project-based teaching process according to the Blended learning model with Google Classroom/Zalo support, and applie of the teaching procedure in the Methods of Teaching Mathematics module.
Tóm tắt
Dạy học Dự án là một hình thức dạy học có thể phát triển toàn diện năng lực người học. Tuy nhiên, dạy học Dự án có những hạn chế về thời gian, không gian, chi phí, năng lực. Với mô hình dạy học Kết hợp có thể phát huy những ưu điểm và khắc phục những hạn chế này của dạy học Dự án. Dựa trên nghiên cứu về ứng dụng hỗ trợ giảng dạy, năng lực sinh viên, hệ thống tích hợp học tập và ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin tại trường Đại học Kiên Giang, việc sử dụng Google Classoom/Zalo vào giảng dạy tại trường là phù hợp trong giai đoạn hiện nay. Bài viết trình bày những ưu điểm khi dạy học Dự án theo mô hình dạy học Kết hợp, đề xuất quy trình dạy học Dự án theo mô hình dạy học Kết hợp với sự hỗ trợ Google Classroom/Zalo và trình bày việc vận dụng quy trình dạy học vào học phần Phương pháp dạy học Toán.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design Approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440-454.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693
Nguyen, A. H., Le, D. T. N., Le, H. M., Hoang, Q. D., Nguyen, B. V., & Le, P. T. (2022). Factors affecting the effectiveness of the online course in training pedagogical students on “blended learning”. Vietnam journal of educational sciences, 18(06), 1-5 (in Vietnamese).
https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-8957/12210601
Azhar, K. A., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 2-66.
Trinh, B. V., Phan, T. D. C., & Trinh, P. L. H. (2011). Project-based learning – from theory to practice. HCMUE Journal of Science, no. 28 (in Vietnamese). https://journal.hcmue.edu.vn/index.php/hcmuejos/article/view/1318/1309.
Bryan, A., & Volchenkova, K. N. (2016). Blended learning: definition, models, implications For higher education. Educational Sciences, 8(2), 24–30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14529/ped160204
Chistyakov, A., Zhdanov, S., Avdeeva, E., Dyadichenko, E., Kunitsyna, M., & Yagudina, R. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, 19(5), em2256.
https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128.
Meier, B., & Nguyen, C. V. (2020). Modern teaching theory. University of Education. Hanoi (in Vietnamese).
Dishon, G. (2017). New data, old tensions: Big data, personalized learning, and the challenges of progressive education. In Theory and Research in Education, 15(3).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878517735233.
Nguyen, Đ. K., Duong, V. B., Nguyen, C. C., & Nguyen, T. M. (2023). Organizing learning activities using the "flipped classroom" model with the support of Google Classroom in teaching natural sciences. Vietnam Journal of Education, 23(03), 18-24 (in Vietnamese).
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL Implementation Hurdle: Supporting the Efforts of K–12 Teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 40-54.
https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118269558.
Vu, G. T., & Nguyen, N. H. (2019). B-learning - A suitable learning modality for higher education in Vietnam at digital age. Hue Journal of Science: Educational Sciences, 64(1), 165-177 (in Vietnamese).
http://dx.doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2019-0017
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Ed.), In book: Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, chapter 1, 3-21.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258834966
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education, 3rd ed., 333–350. New York, NY: Routledge.
Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2021). Project-based learning in integrated science education: Active teachers’ perceptions and practices. International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, Lumat General Issue, 9(1), 149–173.
https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392.
Nguyen, H. T. K. (2024). Foster the capacity of project based teaching for Mathematics pedagogy students at Kien Giang University. TNU Journal of Science and Technology, 229(04), 429-438 (in Vietnamese).
https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.9769.
Jones, N., Chew, E., & Blackey, H. (2011). The BL Journey of the University of Glamorgan. In Reggie Kwan, Joseph Fong, Lam-for Kwok, Jeanne Lam (Eds), Hybrid Learning: Organizational Frameworks for Hybrid Learning, 4th International Conference, ICHL 2011 Hong Kong, China, 157-166.
Kahn, C., & Hindman, L. (2021). Highly Effective Blended Teaching Practices. Blended learning: Research Perspectives, 3, 94-113. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003037736.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: a review of the literature. Improving Schools Journal, 19(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733.
Kumar, A., Krishnamurthi, R., Bhatia, S., Kaushik, K., Ahuja, N.J, Nayyar, A., & Masud, M. (2021). Blended Learning Tools and Practices: Comprehensive Analysis. Open Access Journal, 9, 85151- 85197.
Kieu, L. T., Tran, N. M., Đang, H. T. T., Đoan, H. T. T., Tran, H. B., Phan, T. T., & Le, N. Q. (2024). International experience in building teaching plan under blended learning model and recommendations for Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 20(01), 73-80 (in Vietnamese).
https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-8957/12410111
Nguyen, N. T. V. (2023). Using blended learning model in training biology pedagogical students: The case of teaching chapter “teaching guide for evolution”. Vietnam journal of educational sciences, 19(11), 37-41 (in Vietnamese).
https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-8957/12311106
Doan, N. T. T. (2024). Blended learning - flipped classroom model on the VLE platform of Ho Chi Minh city university of education and enhancing self-study competence for students in the era of digital transformation. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 20(1), 60-66 (in Vietnamese).
https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-8957/12410109
Tafahomi, R. (2021). Application of Blended Learning through Practical Project-Based Instruction: Opportunities and Constraints. Pedagogi Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 21(2), 77-89.
https://doi.org/10.24036/pedagogi.v21i2.1093.
Viro, E., Joutsenlahti, J., Tahvanainen, V., & Lehtonen, D. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on project-based learning in mathematics and science. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 12-31.
Vivo, K. D. (2022). A new research base for rigorous project-based learning. Sage Journals, 103(5), 36-41.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217221079977.
Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Jr., Bloom, L., Kennett, D. W., Hoekstra, N. J., Goldman, S. R., & Rujimora, J. (2024). Are Pre-Service Educators Prepared to Implement Personalized Learning?: An Alignment Analysis of Educator Preparation Standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 75(2), 219–235.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231201367