Xây dựng mô hình giáo dục dựa trên lý thuyết học sâu: Một cách tiếp cận sư phạm đổi mới
,
,
,
,
,
,
và
Article Sidebar
Full Text: 
PDF
Abstract
This study proposes an educational model integrating modern instructional methods such as WebQuest, learning by teaching (LbT), Building Thinking Classrooms (BTC), and Concept-Based Inquiry (CBI). The model effectively combines educational tools (OKMindmap, YouTube), educational technologies (ChatGPT, Educational Data Mining - EDM), and educational communication platforms (VideoTeach), aiming to comprehensively develop the 6Cs competencies: character, citizenship, collaboration, communication, creativity, and critical thinking. Through a literature review and model design, the study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of the model in promoting pedagogical innovation and enhancing learner competencies in the context of modern education.
Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu này được thực hiện nhằm đề xuất một mô hình giáo dục tích hợp các phương pháp giảng dạy hiện đại như WebQuest, Học qua Giảng dạy (Learning by Teaching - LbT), Xây dựng lớp học tư duy (Building Thinking Classrooms - BTC), và Truy vấn dựa trên khái niệm (Concept-Based Inquiry - CBI). Mô hình kết hợp hiệu quả các công cụ giáo dục (OKMindmap, YouTube), công nghệ giáo dục (ChatGPT, Khai phá dữ liệu học tập - EDM) và truyền thông giáo dục (VideoTeach), hướng tới phát triển toàn diện năng lực 6Cs: phẩm chất, công dân toàn cầu, hợp tác, giao tiếp, sáng tạo và tư duy phản biện. Thông qua tổng quan tài liệu và thiết kế mô hình, kết quả nghiên cứu giúp chứng minh tính khả thi và tiềm năng của mô hình trong việc thúc đẩy đổi mới sư phạm và phát triển năng lực người học trong bối cảnh giáo dục hiện đại.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Belcher, W. (2019). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A guide to academic publishing success (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. MIT Press.
https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6052.001.0001
Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2018). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Bui, L. D., Kim, Y. G., Ho, W., Ho, H. T. T., & Pham, N. K. (2018). Developing WebQuest 2.0 model for promoting computational thinking skill. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.29), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13304
Dao, C. N. (2017). Situation and methods to promote scientific research activities of lecturers at Can Tho University. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(7), 117–121 (in Vietnamese). https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jvn.2018.131
Dodge, B. (1995). Some thoughts about WebQuests.
http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html
Erickson, H. L., & Lanning, L. A. (2014). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom (2nd ed.). Corwin.
Fischer, M., & Glazek, K. (2018). The role of computational thinking in the education of young learners. Journal of Educational Technology, 19(2), 45–56.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Corwin Press.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2019). What’s deep about deep learning? https://corwin-connect.com/2019/09/whats-deep-about-deep-learning/
Giannakos, M. N. (2013). Exploring the video-based learning research: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12097
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, W. R., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., Schor, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Watkins, S. C. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Schmid, U., Gasser, U., Kasneci, G., & Jaksztat, J. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Instruction, 86, Article 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101750
Khan, S. (2020). The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined (Rev. ed.). Twelve.
Liljedahl, P. (2020). Building thinking classrooms in mathematics, grades K–12: 14 teaching practices for enhancing learning. Corwin Press.
Marschall, C., & French, R. (2018). Concept-based inquiry in action. Corwin Press.
Martin, J.-P. (2004). Lernen durch Lehren: Konzept und Praxis. Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mollick, E., & Mollick, L. (2023). Exploring the impact of project-based learning on student engagement and success. Journal of Educational Research, 45(3), 112–123.
Morgan, R., Meldrum, K., Bryan, S., Mathiesen, B., Yakob, N., Esa, N., & Ziden, A. A. (2017). Embedding digital literacies in curricula: Australian and Malaysian experiences. Trong G. B. Teh & S. C. Choy (Chủ biên), Empowering 21st century learners through holistic and enterprising learning (pp. 11–19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4241-6_2
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Peña-Ayala, A. (2014). Educational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1432–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.042
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 50(3), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2053532
Schramm, W. (1977). Big media, little media: Tools and technologies for instruction. SAGE Publications.
Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2013). Social media for teaching and learning. Pearson Learning Solutions. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Trong Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–40.
Statista. (2023). Number of YouTube users worldwide from 2016 to 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Wiley, D. (2007). On the sustainability of open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1–12.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT in education: Prospects, challenges, and ethical considerations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 987–1003.