CÁC CHIẾN THUẬT HỌC SINH PHỔ THÔNG TRUNG HỌC SỬ DỤNG ĐỂ LÀM BÀI KIỂM TRA TRẮC NGHIỆM MÔN TIẾNG ANH
Article Sidebar
Full Text: 
PDF
Abstract
Tóm tắt
Bài nghiên cứu này khảo sát mức độ sử dụng chiến thuật trong khi làm bài kiểm tra trắc nghiệm của 131 học sinh trường trung học phổ thông (THPT) chuyên Nguyễn Bỉnh Khiêm, Thành phố Vĩnh Long, Việt Nam. Mức độ trung bình của 3 loại chiến thuật được tìm ra: chiến thuật nhận thức ((M = 3.61, SD = .51), chiến thuật siêu nhận thức (M = 3.64, SD = .54), chiến thuật đền bù (M = 4.11, SD = .46). Dựa trên kết quảđó, nhóm nghiên cứu đưa ra một sốđề xuất cho việc dạy và học tiếng Anh ở các trường THPT ở Việt Nam.
Article Details
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing: Oxford University Press.
Burton, S. J., Sudweeks, R. R., Merrill, P. F., & Wood, B. (1990). How to prepare better multiple-choice test items: Guidelines for university faculty. Brigham Young University. Department of Instructional Science.
Cohen, A. D., Upton, T. A., & Service, E. T. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. Research report-educational testing service Princeton RR, 6.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. Tesol Quarterly, 261-297.
Gronlund, N. E. (1977). Rules for constructing multiple-choice items. Constructing achievement tests, 174-189.
Hughes, C. (2007). A discussion paper prepared for the assessment subcommittee of the UQ teaching and learning committee
Lawrence, W. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students' metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a foreign language, 21(1), 37 - 59.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
Nguyen, T. M. T. (2010). Learners’ metacognitive strategy use and reading comprehension: insights from a Vietnamese context. M.A. Can Tho University, Vietnam. Can Tho city.
O'Malley, J., & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17(2), 235-247.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know: New York: NY: Newbury House.
Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26 - 58.
Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach (Vol. 8): Cambridge Univ Press.
Sadler, P. M. (1998). Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments. Journal of research in science teaching, 35(3), 265-296.
Shmais, W. A. (2002). Identifying the Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Arab University Students: A Case Study. An-Najah University Journal for Research, 16(2), 633-661. Retrieved from http://www631.najah.edu/researches/644.pdf.
Song, X. (2005). Language learner strategy use and English proficiency on the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment Volume 3 2005, 1001, 1.
Stough, L. M. (1993). Research on Multiple-Choice Questions: Implications for Strategy Instruction.