TỔNG QUAN VỀ ỨNG DỤNG PHƯƠNG PHÁP PHÂN TÍCH THỨ BẬC TRONG QUẢN LÝ CHUỖI CUNG ỨNG

Trần Thị Mỹ Dung *

* Tác giả liên hệ (ttmdung@ctu.edu.vn)

Article Sidebar

Full Text: PDF

Ngày nhận bài: 20-04-2021
Ngày duyệt đăng: 03-06-2022
Ngày xuất bản: 01-05-2012
Title:
Lượt xem
1405
Downloads
1144
Trích dẫn
Dung, T. T. M. (2012). TỔNG QUAN VỀ ỨNG DỤNG PHƯƠNG PHÁP PHÂN TÍCH THỨ BẬC TRONG QUẢN LÝ CHUỖI CUNG ỨNG. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học cần Thơ, (21a), 180-189. Truy vấn từ https://ctujsvn.ctu.edu.vn/index.php/ctujsvn/article/view/1170
Số báo
Số. 21a (2012)
Chuyên mục
Công nghệ

Abstract

This study reviews the literature of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applications in supply chain management. A total of 70 papers published in high quality management journals from 1999 to 2009 are compiled and categorized by each element of supply chain; namely, supplier, manufacturer, distributor, and customer. The content of these papers are analyzed to solve the research objectives: (i) The application of AHP in supply chain management; (ii) Success factors of AHP implementation and (iii) The opportunities for future research. This review will help researchers and practitioners have a broader understanding regarding application of AHP in supply chain management.
Keywords: Hierarchy Process, Supply Chain Management, Literature Review

Tóm tắt

Bài báo cáo giới thiệu tổng quan về việc ứng dụng phương pháp phân tích thứ bậc (Analytic Hierarchy Process – AHP) trong quản lý chuỗi cung ứng. Tất cả 70 bài báo đăng trên các tạp chí uy tín trong lĩnh vực quản lý điều hành từ năm 1999 đến năm 2009 được thu thập và phân nhóm theo mỗi thành phần trong chuỗi cung ứng bao gồm nhà cung cấp, nhà sản xuất, nhà phân phối và khách hàng. Nội dung của các bài báo được phân tích nhằm hướng đến giải quyết các mục tiêu: (i) Tìm hiểu vềứng dụng của AHP trong quản lý chuỗi cung ứng (ii) Yếu tố giúp cho viêc áp dụng AHP thành công và (iii) Định hướng nghiên cứu trong tương lai. Nghiên cứu này sẽ giúp cho các nhà nghiên cứu và ứng dụng có một cái nhìn sâu rộng hơn về áp dụng phương pháp phân tích thứ bậc trong quản lý chuỗi cung ứng.

Từ khóa: phương pha?p phân ti?ch thư? bâ?c, qua?n ly? chuô?i cung ư?ng, tô?ng quan

Article Details

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdi, M.R; Labib, A.W, A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study. International Journal of Production Research, 2003. 41: p. 2273-2299.

Abdi, M.R; Labib, A.W., Feasibility study of the tactical design justification for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using the fuzzy analytical hierarchical process. International Journal of Production Research, 2004b. 42: p. 3055-3076.

Abdi, M.R; Labib, A.W., Grouping and selecting products: the design key of Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMSs). International Journal of Production Research, 2004a. 42: p. 521-546.

Ayag, Z., A hybrid approach to machine-tool selection through AHP and simulation. International Journal of Production Research, 2007. 45: p. 2029-2050.

Ayag, Z., An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment. International Journal of Production Research, 2005. 43: p. 687-713.

Badri, M.A., Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 1999. 62: p. 237-248.

Bhattacharya, A.; Sarkar, B.; Mukherjee, S.K., Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 2005. 43: p. 671-3685.

Bititci, U.S.; Suwignjo, P.; Carrie, A.S., Strategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001. 69: p. 15-22.

Chan, F.T.S., Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: an analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Production Research, 2003. 41: p. 3549-3579.

Chan, F.T.S.; Kumar, N., Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega, 2007. 35: p. 417-431.

Chan, F.T.S.; Kumar, N.; Tiwari, M.K., et al., Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Production Research, 2008. 46: p. 3825-3857.

Chen, S.J.; Lin, L., Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2004. 51: p. 111-124.

Chen, Y.M.; Huang, PN, Bi-negotiation integrated AHP in suppliers selection

Dey, P.K.; Hariharan, S.; Clegg, B.T., Measuring the operational performance of intensive care units using the analytic hierarchy process approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2006. 26: p. 849-865.

Gungor, Z.; Arikan, F., Application of fuzzy decision making in part-machine grouping. International Journal of Production Economics, 2000. 63: p. 181-193.

Handfield, R.; Walton, S.V.; Sroufe, R., et al., Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operations Research, 2002. 141: p. 70-87.

Ho W, Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008. 186: p. 211-228

Huang, C.C.; Chu, P.Y.; Chiang, Y.H., A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection. Omega, 2008. 36: p. 1038-1052.

Kengpol, A., Design of a decision support system to evaluate logistics distribution network in Greater Mekong Subregion Countries. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008. 115: p. 388-399.

Kengpol, A., Design of a decision support system to evaluate the investment in a new distribution centre. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004. 90: p 59-70.

Korpela, J.; Kylaheiko, K.; Lehmuswaara, A., et al., An analytic approach to production capacity allocation and supply chain design. International Journal of Production Economics, 2002. 78: p. 187-195.

Korpela, J.; Lehmusvaara, A., A customer oriented approach to warehouse network evaluation and design. International Journal of Production Economics, 1999. 59: p. 135-146.

Korpela, J.; Lehmusvaara, A.; Nisonen, J., Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007. 108: p. 135-142.

Korpela, J.; Lehmusvaara, A.; Tuominen, M., Customer service based design of the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001. 69: p. 193-204.

Kull, T.J.; Talluri, S., A supply risk reduction model using integrated multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2008. 55: p. 409-419.

Lee, A.H.I., A fuzzy AHP evaluation model for buyer-supplier relationships with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. International Journal of Production Research, 2009. 47: p. 4255-4280.

Levary, R.R., Ranking foreign suppliers based on supply risk. Supply Chain Management – An International Journal, 2007. 12: p. 392-394.

Li, J.Z.; Zhang, H.C.; Gonzalez, M.A., et al., A multi-objective fuzzy graph approach for modular formulation considering end-of-life issues. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46: p. 4011-4033.

Liberatore M. J., Nydick R. L, The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008. 89: p. 194-207.

Liu, F.H.F.; Hai, H.L., The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economics, 2005. 97: p. 308-317.

Liu, L.B.; Berger, P.; Zeng, A., et al., Applying the analytic hierarchy process to the offshore outsourcing location decision. Supply Chain Management – An International Journal, 2008. 13: p. 435-449.

Lu, L.Y.Y.; Wu, C.H.; Kuo, T.C., Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis . International Journal of Production Research, 2007. 45: p. 5451-5451.

Masella, C.; Rangone, A., A contingent approach to the design of vendor selection systems for different types of co-operative customer/supplier relationships

Min, H.K.; Melachrinoudis, E., The relocation of a hybrid manufacturing/distribution facility from supply chain perspectives: a case study. Omega, 1999. 27: p. 75-85.

Padillo, J.M.; Diaby, M., A multiple-criteria decision methodology for the make-or-buy problem. International Journal of Production Research, 1999. 37: p. 3203-3229.

Ramanathan, R., Supplier selection problem: integrating DEA with the approaches of total cost of ownership and AHP. Supply Chain Management – An International Journal, 2007. 12: p. 258-261.

Rao, R.V.; Parnichkun, M., Flexible manufacturing system selection using a combinatorial mathematics-based decision-making method. International Journal of Production Research, 2009. 47: p. 6981-6998.

Saaty, T.L., The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980

Saaty T.L, Decisions Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1995.

Saaty, T.L. and Vargas L.G., Decision Making in Economic, Political, Social, and Technologycal Environments with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1994.

Saaty, T.L., Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1994.

Sevkli, M.; Koh, S.C.L.; Zaim, S., et al., An application of data envelopment analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection: a case study of BEKO in Turkey. International Journal of Production Research, 2007, 45: p. 1973-2003.

Suwignjo, P.; Bititci, U.S.; Carrie, A.S., Quantitative models for performance measurement system. International Journal of Production Economics, 2000. 64: p. 231-241.

Tam, M.C.Y; Tummala, V.M.R., An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega, 2001. 29: p. 171-182.

Ting, S.G.; Cho, D.I., An integrated approach for supplier selection and purchasing decisions. Supply Chain Management – An International Journal, 2008. 13: p. 116-127.

Vaidya O. S, Kumar S., Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research 2006.169: p. 1-29.

Wang, K.M.; Wang, C.K.; Hu, C., Analytic hierarchy process with fuzzy scoring in evaluating multidisciplinary R&D projects in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005. 52: p. 119-129.

Xia, W.J.; Wu, Z.M., Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega, 2007. 35: p. 494-504.

Yang, T.H.; Kuo, C.W., A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operations Research, 2003. 147: p. 128-136.

Zakarian, A.; Kusiak, A., Forming teams: an analytical approach. IIE Transaction, 1999. 31: p. 85-97.